a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter
- a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter
(Lat., from the qualified statement to the unqualified) The fallacy of taking out a needed qualification: ‘If it is always permissible to kill in war, then it is always permissible to kill.’ Also known as the converse fallacy of the accident.
Philosophy dictionary.
Academic.
2011.
Look at other dictionaries:
A dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter — (лат.) логич. ошибка, состоящая в том, что средний термин силлогизма входит в одну посылку с ограничением (secundum quid), а в другую без всякого ограничения (simpliciter). Философский энциклопедический словарь. М.: Советская энциклопедия … Философская энциклопедия
A dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter — From what has been said to that which has been said plainly. An error of logic in concluding the existence of collateral facts from a presumption. Hyde v United States, 225 US 347, 385, 56 1, Ed 1114, 1133, 32 S Ct 793 … Ballentine's law dictionary
Dicto simpliciter — A dicto simpliciter (Latin: from a maxim without qualification meaning from a universal rule ) or ad Dictum simpliciter (Latin: to a maxim without qualification meaning to a universal rule ) are Latin phrases for a type of logical fallacy. The a… … Wikipedia
secundum quid — (Lat., according to which) Shorthand for a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid … Philosophy dictionary
A dicto simpliciter — (Latin: from a maxim without qualification , meaning from a universal rule ) or ad dictum simpliciter (Latin: to a maxim without qualification , meaning to a universal rule ) are Latin phrases for a type of logical fallacy. A dicto simpliciter… … Wikipedia
a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid — (Lat., from the statement unqualified to the statement qualified) The (alleged) fallacy of arguing from a general to a particular case, without recognizing qualifying factors: ‘If people shouldn’t park here, they shouldn’t park here to help put… … Philosophy dictionary
Fallacy — In logic and rhetoric, a fallacy is usually incorrect argumentation in reasoning resulting in a misconception or presumption. By accident or design, fallacies may exploit emotional triggers in the listener or interlocutor (appeal to emotion), or… … Wikipedia
Ошибки (лог.) — находятся в суждениях и умозаключениях. Ошибочным суждением наз. такое, которое не соответствует действительному объекту познания, хотя оно и почитается соответственным действительности. Если же намеренно выставляется несоответственное суждение и … Энциклопедический словарь Ф.А. Брокгауза и И.А. Ефрона
Converse accident — The logical fallacy of converse accident (also called reverse accident, destroying the exception, or a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter) is a deductive fallacy that can occur in a statistical syllogism when an exception to a… … Wikipedia
Sophistik — Sophistik, die Kunst durch Zweideutigkeiten, trügerische Argumente u. halbwahre Sätze falschen Behauptungen den Schein der Wahrheit zu geben, od. durch verfängliche Fragen, wo nicht zu täuschen, doch Andere in Verlegenheit zu setzen, überhaupt… … Pierer's Universal-Lexikon