a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid
- a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid
(Lat., from the statement unqualified to the statement qualified) The (alleged) fallacy of arguing from a general to a particular case, without recognizing qualifying factors: ‘If people shouldn’t park here, they shouldn’t park here to help put out the fire.’ With forms of proposition other than generalizations, more evidently invalid arguments might bear this name: ‘If some snakes are harmless, then some snakes in this bag are harmless.’ Also known as the fallacy of the accident.
Philosophy dictionary.
Academic.
2011.
Look at other dictionaries:
Dicto simpliciter — A dicto simpliciter (Latin: from a maxim without qualification meaning from a universal rule ) or ad Dictum simpliciter (Latin: to a maxim without qualification meaning to a universal rule ) are Latin phrases for a type of logical fallacy. The a… … Wikipedia
secundum quid — (Lat., according to which) Shorthand for a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid … Philosophy dictionary
A dicto simpliciter — (Latin: from a maxim without qualification , meaning from a universal rule ) or ad dictum simpliciter (Latin: to a maxim without qualification , meaning to a universal rule ) are Latin phrases for a type of logical fallacy. A dicto simpliciter… … Wikipedia
A dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter — (лат.) логич. ошибка, состоящая в том, что средний термин силлогизма входит в одну посылку с ограничением (secundum quid), а в другую без всякого ограничения (simpliciter). Философский энциклопедический словарь. М.: Советская энциклопедия … Философская энциклопедия
a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter — (Lat., from the qualified statement to the unqualified) The fallacy of taking out a needed qualification: ‘If it is always permissible to kill in war, then it is always permissible to kill.’ Also known as the converse fallacy of the accident … Philosophy dictionary
A dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter — From what has been said to that which has been said plainly. An error of logic in concluding the existence of collateral facts from a presumption. Hyde v United States, 225 US 347, 385, 56 1, Ed 1114, 1133, 32 S Ct 793 … Ballentine's law dictionary
Fallacy — In logic and rhetoric, a fallacy is usually incorrect argumentation in reasoning resulting in a misconception or presumption. By accident or design, fallacies may exploit emotional triggers in the listener or interlocutor (appeal to emotion), or… … Wikipedia
Ошибки (лог.) — находятся в суждениях и умозаключениях. Ошибочным суждением наз. такое, которое не соответствует действительному объекту познания, хотя оно и почитается соответственным действительности. Если же намеренно выставляется несоответственное суждение и … Энциклопедический словарь Ф.А. Брокгауза и И.А. Ефрона
Ошибки — (лог.) находятся в суждениях и умозаключениях. Ошибочным суждением наз. такое, которое не соответствует действительному объекту познания, хотя оно и почитается соответственным действительности. Если же намеренно выставляется несоответственное… … Энциклопедический словарь Ф.А. Брокгауза и И.А. Ефрона
Accident (fallacy) — The logical fallacy of accident, also called destroying the exception or a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid, is a deductive fallacy occurring in statistical syllogisms (an argument based on a generalization) when an exception to the… … Wikipedia
